Results matching “Seattle”

I joined four other Seattle-area Tesla owners in driving down to Portland for the NEDRA Wayland Invitational IV electric vehicle drag racing event at Portland International Raceways on July 24th and 25th. My friend Richard wasn't due to receive his 2010 Roadster for another week or two, so he and I shared the driving and the racing in my car.

None of us had any previous drag racing experience, we were just doing it to promote electric vehicles by showing a bunch of people that EVs can be as fun and powerful as gas-burners without sending a bunch of our our dollars overseas or dumping CO2 into the atmosphere.

Over the two days, thanks to Northwest Handling Systems, John Wayland, James Morrison, and several others behind the scenes, who arranged charging both on and off the track, I was able to post the best time in a 2008 Roadster: a 12.982 second 1/4 mile ET at 103.48 mph. The best Roadster time was set by Scotty Pollacheck (the professional driver/rider of the famous Killacycle) in James Morrison's freshly-delivered 2010 Roadster sport: 12.643 second 1/4 mile ET at 102.89 mph.

At the Wayland Invitational, I got to race head-to-head against other 2008 Roadsters using the same driving technique and as well as controlling other parameters. Having Richard racing in my car allowed me to compare how weight changed times with other parameters held constant. Also got to race against the famous White Zombie. We had two nights there, one with charging at the track and one without. My YouTube channel has some videos from that weekend.

Two weeks later, the same group of owners spent another evening at Pacific Raceways in Kent, WA this time with Richard driving his shiny new 2010 Roadster. I was able to do some more experiments there.

Based on what I've seen so far, it breaks down like this:

13.40 seconds: 2008 Roadster, medium weight driver with a cool battery pack, single foot start, traction control on, racing in warm weather at sea level.

0.32 seconds - having a warm battery pack from a recent 240V/40A charge
0.10 seconds - traction control off
0.07 seconds - lose 20 to 30 lbs of driver weight
0.07 seconds - two-footed start (indirect estimate)

I didn't compare single foot launch and two-foot launch with all other parameters controlled. From otherwise similar runs in Portland and Kent, I saw a difference of about 0.07 seconds, but that was different tracks, different charge profiles and different ambient temperatures. The other delta were pretty well controlled.

One owner in Portland increased tire pressure to 40 psi all around trying to shave off a few hundredths to break into the high 12's and didn't get any benefit.

There's also some variation from car to car depending on how well the motor was wound, etc. While there was about 0.07 seconds difference between Richard and me in my car (presumably due to weight), there was a much smaller difference between Scott in his car and me in mine (0.04 seconds) even though I would guess the weight difference to be similar.

I didn't sense the stock tires spinning even with a two-foot launch and TC off, so I don't see how sticky tires would help on a 2008 Roadster. I have confirmation from Tesla to not expect the 2008 Roadster to spin the stock tires with TC off when on dry pavement and driving in a straight line. (That said, I am not recommending turning off TC in any other circumstance.)

I didn't get a chance to try all of the optimizations on the same run. It was only on the second day of the Wayland Invitational that I had a chance to charge up at the track and that was before I learned about the two-foot launch technique in detail, and also before I had the nerve to turn off traction control. So, I don't know what happens when you stack up all of the techniques together.

According to my data, getting a stock 2008 Roadster under 12.8 is going to take a trick I don't know about. Perhaps a driver under 100 lbs, or driving at higher altitude could do it. It might also help to fold back the side mirrors to reduce drag. It will be interesting to see what happens at the NEDRA nationals in Denver in September.

Tesla Motors kicked off their first visit to Seattle with an owners Town Hall meeting last night. It was an informal Q&A discussion. In attendance were about a dozen of the thirty-something Washington state Tesla owners and a half dozen Tesla representatives. We chatted about all things Tesla, from production status to possible Seattle store locations. Here's my summary.

Production Status

Signature #38 has entered production and they have delivered into the first few Signature 100 owners. The production rate is about ten per week. They expect to step that up to twenty per week by the end of this year. The first batch of the 10-per-week production will arrive in California next week and they will begin installing drivetrain 1.5 in those vehicles.

Ramping up production turns out to be very complex. It's not just about the assembly process in Hethel, but also about coordinating all of the parts suppliers. For some suppliers it's easy to increase delivery rate, but it's more challenging for others and everyone has to be on board to meet the production rate.

The production rate is impacted by a variety of things, some planned, some not. The Hethel plant shuts down for two weeks in August and for another two weeks around Christmas. There are other scheduled stops. If there's a problem in any stage of the assembly process, output stops until the problem is resolved. Depending on the nature of the problem, they might be able to process the backlog, increasing the output rate to maintain the average rate, or time may be lost.

The Production Timeline

Starting when a car enters production at Hethel, it takes about three weeks to finish the glider. There is approximately one week of painting, one week of assembly line, and one week of interior, testing, and finishing. Right now, it's actually taking about four weeks for the whole process, but three weeks is the goal.

Then there is shipping. It takes about six weeks to transport by ship from Hethel to Menlo Park. Air freight is much faster and much more expensive (and burns more carbon which may be an issue for many Tesla owners). Right now, all of the gliders are being airfreighted and when they switch to ships they may offer an airfreight option at additional cost. (Maybe somewhere in the $4,000 to $7,000 range, TBD.)

When the glider gets to Menlo Park, the motor, ESS, and PEM are installed and the whole car is tested, then prepped for delivery. This takes two more weeks.

So, right now it's about six weeks plus shipping time from start of production to delivery, with a goal of getting that down to five weeks plus shipping time. That's eleven weeks, nearly three months, when the cars are shipped by boat, assuming no problems with suppliers or the assembly process.

Seattle Tesla Store Location

Darryl Siry spent the day scouting store locations and found three promising locations in Seattle, two in the South Lake Union area and one on Capitol Hill. There was vocal support for finding a suitable Bellevue location, but their real estate agent didn't show Darryl anything good there.

The greater Seattle area is split in half by Lake Washington, creating a commuting nightmare between Seattle and "the Eastside." Seattle is the big city with high population density, a big downtown area and many businesses, including Amazon and Starbucks. Bellevue is a growing city with its own downtown area. Surrounding that are the suburbs and the area's largest employers: Microsoft (in Redmond) and Boeing (in Everett, Renton, and Kent). Google has a small presence on both sides of the lake.

Crossing the lake during morning and evening rush hour is terrible, as traffic across the two bridges clogs up and slows to a crawl. So traveling the few miles from Seattle to the Eastside can be a big pain and will be a barrier to making a casual trip to the Tesla Store if you're on the wrong side of the lake.

Tesla has a tough choice in finding a location that stands out, isn't crazy expensive and is convenient for both current owners and prospective Roadster and Model S owners. Eventually, they will have a presence on both sides of the lake, but we all want a visible, accessible location on our side. The conversation was pretty similar to the discussions on the owners forum for New York, Chicago and Miami.

The Mobile Connector

If the mobile connector is powered with a standard household outlet (120V/15A circuit, drawing 12A) the Roadster charges at a rate of about 8 miles of range per hour of charging, or more than 30 hours to charge a fully depleted pack. Connected to a 240V/50A circuit, drawing 30A, the rate jumps to about 40 miles of range per hour of charging, or about 7 hours to charge a fully depleted battery.

However, it turns out that there are regulatory roadblocks to Tesla Motors selling an EV power cable with a 240V/50A connector. Basically, it's illegal.

The existing EV owner community knows that the best way to charge their car on the road is to find an RV park and use one of their 240V/50A plugs, so obviously RVs have these types of connectors. When we had our RAV4-EV charger installed in our garage, we had the electrician install a 240V/50A outlet and put the corresponding plug on the charger. So, if we ever want to take it on the road, we just unhook the charger from the wall, put it in the back and map out stops at RV parks. No problem.

Unfortunately, there are laws that restrict the types of plugs that EV manufacturers can sell, but these laws don't apply to RVs. Tesla Motors considers it absolutely essential that owners have a way to charge from these 240V/50A sources and will find us a solution, but it's not here yet.

Realistic Range

The range for the Roadster with drivetrain 1.5 is 240 on the highway EPA cycle, 250 on the city cycle and 244 for the mixed city/highway range. The EPA highway range uses a 55 mph cycle with a 10% allowance for A/C.

There's been a bunch of discussion about the real-world range when driving the Roadster at actual freeway speeds. Martin Eberhard got a lot of owners nervous by noting that he drove it aggressively for 125 miles and had 30 miles of range left. The firmware in Martin's Roadster uses a very conservative estimate for remaining range, so the actual range would have been higher than 155 had he kept driving.

Tesla is continuing to improve the firmware and the range estimate. Newer firmware will show three range estimates based on (1) your current instantaneous power usage, (2) average power usage over the past 30 miles, and (3) expected power usage by the EPA highway cycle.

Obviously, it's important for Roadster drivers to have a good idea of how much charge remains in the car. Having an overly conservative estimate isn't much better than having an overly optimistic estimate, and the fact is the remaining range depends on how you are driving. By providing the three numbers, drivers get an idea of how far they can go if they keep driving the way they have been, or if they drop down to more conservative EPA-style driving.

In addition to the remaining range estimate, there are multiple levels of low battery warning. The first level puts a limit on torque, which will limit acceleration but not speed. In the last warning stage, a limit will be placed on top speed. When the battery is nearly depleted, there will be a warning of imminent power loss and you'll need to pull over and stop before the car just stops. At that point, you can turn the car off then back on again to enter "extended range" mode. Doing that will discharge the batteries low enough that battery life may be impacted, but there will be plenty of warning before things get to that stage.

Extrapolating from their personal experience, they estimate a range of about 200 miles driving at a sustained 75 mph, and a range of 150 miles driving very aggressively. They will be doing some more methodical long-range testing with the new drivetrain and will let us know what they find out. (They were planning to do some long range testing during the drive up to Seattle, but the car left later than expected and may not have had a chance to do so.)

On a personal note, Cathy and I have been driving our RAV4-EV as our primary daily vehicle for about two months now. At first we were nervous about its 100-mile range (80 miles without getting into the yellow warning level on the charge gauge.) After getting used to driving an EV, even that short range is way more than we need for daily driving. We don't even bother charging it every night unless we're below 50% charge or we expect to travel farther than our usual trips into Issaquah and Bellevue. We've only had one time when we didn't charge overnight and had a surprise trip the next day and couldn't take the EV.

The only reason we don't charge it every night is because the RAV4-EV charger isn't so smart and fills the battery pack all the way up, which causes excess heating, thus potentially reducing battery life. The Tesla Roadster has a much smarter charger that allows you to choose between a charge level that's the best for long-term battery life, or a full charge for maximum driving range. With the Roadster we'll charge it every night and have way more range than we'll ever need, and we'll only charge it all the way up on the rare occasion when we drive to Portland or eastern Washington.

Some people have long commutes, but for our fairly typical needs, an 80-mile range is plenty, and a 244-mile range will be total overkill. We really love not having to go to the gas station, we just charge overnight and have the full range in the morning.

Model S

The Model S will be a pure electric vehicle, not a range-extended serial hybrid. There was a brief period when they were planning to offer an RE-EV option, but that passed and they are back on the pure EV track.

They have the exterior design and Darryl says it looks great. It is technically a hatchback design, but in a good way, perhaps something along the lines of the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class. (They in fact have a Model S test mule based on a CLS.) It will have a flat battery pack, as opposed to the Roadster's boxy ESS. Their production goal is 20,000 per year, worldwide.

When pressed about when we would get to see it, they only say it will be "soon." The plan is to show it first to existing Tesla customers, then the press, then the public by spring of 2009.

The Model S factory location isn't final yet, it still has to go through the environmental impact study and approval process. There are the usual wildlife issues that happen pretty much everywhere. Their goal is to have cars rolling out by late 2010, but that's an aggressive schedule that is vulnerable to various issues including delays resulting from the environmental impact study.

Current customers will get the first opportunity to order the Model S, with multiple slots open to each Roadster owner, including a way to give a slot to their closest friends.

THE GOOD

The Kindle's display is nearly as readable as paper, the only issue is a slight glossiness.

It's about the same size and lighter than the paperback I just finished reading, and much lighter than the large number of books it can contain. Finally, I'll be able to take a Neal Stephenson book on vacation!

You can read the Kindle with it sitting in your lap without holding the book to keep it open and positioned.

The keyboard below the screen is great for reading in bed, because the Kindle can sink into the comforter without obscuring any text.

The page is always flat, there's no curve as the page meets the binding. You don't have to fight with the book to get a good view of the entire page even when you're near either end of a long book.

The shopping experience is awesome. I really like that it doesn't require a computer and is very fast for downloading purchased content. Finish a book, buy a book, keep reading.

The cover is really important, and makes the experience of holding and using the Kindle better.

Having a dictionary instantly available, even when you're away from home, is a really great addition to the reading experience.

You can change the font size from pretty small to pretty large, which should be a boon to a wide spectrum of users who want fonts size to suit their taste and eyesight.

THE BAD

Kindle is uncomfortable to hold in left hand by itself. To get it to easily rest in a stable position, the lower left corner of the Kindle digs into my palm and gets uncomfortable in just a couple of minutes.

The cover attachment seems flaky, but is working well so far. I feel like the catch mechanism isn't very secure and will likely loosen up or wear slightly and stop working. Time will tell.

The screen flash when changing pages is distracting, as is the slight delay. The delay is noticeable, but not annoying. I expect people will get used to the flash.

The power and wireless switches are cheap-feeling sliders on the back of the book, which is a real pain to get at when in its case. You don't need to mess with the wireless switch that often, but I feel like I should turn the book off whenever I put it down for more than a few minutes. Should I pop it out of the case to get at the power switch or try to snake my finger between the Kindle and the case without detaching the flaky little catch? It's an annoyance every time I put the book down.

Newspapers don't work on the Kindle. First off, newspapers are not a text-only medium but the Kindle is largely a text-only device. That's fine for novels, but terrible for newspapers. I tried a sample issue of the Seattle Times and it was horrible. I would really like to stop consuming paper by the pound, but newspapers need photos, comics, crossword puzzles and non-linear browsing. I'm not much of a sports fan, so I spend about one second looking at the front page of the sports section to see if there's some new hope for the Mariners then move on. In the Kindle edition, five of the eleven pages in the table of contents were sports headlines. The Kindle edition of the Seattle Times is just a flattened text-only subset of their web site. I'll keep recycling the paper for now.

THE DRM

The last electronic eBook I tried was The Rocket eBook which required the use of (bad) software on your computer, and the content you bought was tied to one device. If you broke or lost the device, your content was also lost. Even with those annoyances (with a device that was larger, heavier, and had a less advanced display), I liked the Rocket eBook for reading on vacation and would have kept using it if the product hadn't died. The Kindle has solved the Rocket eBook's most obvious problems and has really moved the electronic book technology forward.

Still the digital rights management (DRM) issues make the Kindle books a lot different from a traditional book. You can't loan or resell content and your content is only available as long as Amazon keeps supporting the content and device. If you buy a book and the bookstore goes out of business or stops selling sci-fi paperbacks, you still own the book. My wife and I read a lot of the same books, so now we have to buy two copies if we both want to read it on our own Kindle? Swapping Kindles doesn't work: if you finish one book and start another, you've effectively glued those two books together -- you can't pass the book you've finished to the other person without also giving up the one you're now reading.

The Kindle books seem to be priced lower than the price of the corresponding paper book, whether it's hard cover or paperback. That sounds good until you realize you're getting a lot less than what you get when you buy a book.

Amazon could improve the proposition by making it possible to transfer a book from one account to another for a small charge, like 50 cents or a dollar. That way, when I'm done reading a book, I can transfer it to my wife's account, or I can pass it on to a friend, or even sell it. Something like this would give users a better sense of owning what they buy, and at the same time give Amazon and the publishers a stream of revenue when books change hands.